Monday, 13 March 2006

Star Wars Galaxies – Faffing About

In the latest update, the following change was made:

In “Mouselook” mode, if the “disable strafing with turn keys” option is checked, turning will rotate your character and not strafe (change made based on community feedback).

(”Mouse look” is when your cursor is locked and you will see a targeting reticle, “cursor mode” is when the cursor is moveable and you will see an arrow as your cursor. You change between the two modes by pressing the ALT key (by default).

This is the original setting for this option. The devs have been faffing about with this for ages, and the community has been complaining that it was a useless change that was needlessly changed over and over again.

‘Community feedback’ indeed…

The Hills Have Eyes (remake) Trailer

The Hills Have Eyes is, according to the cinema trailer, “Terrifying audiences across America.”

This was intercut with night vision shots of the audience.

They didn’t look terrified. They didn’t jump. They didn’t cower away from the screen.

They looked bored.

They were barely moving.

Tuesday, 7 March 2006

Woman loses frozen embryos fight

Woman loses frozen embryos fight

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4779876.stm

The question is, does it matter if the embryos are in a storage facility, or in her womb?

I don’t think so.

If she became pregnant naturally after both parties agreed to have children, then it’s her choice what happens to the embryos.

If they are created and viable, but held in storage, it’s suddenly a decision they both have to agree on.

I’m sorry but people can’t have it both ways. You can’t say that destruction of these viable embryos is right just because one parent doesn’t want them but on the other hand say that abortion is ok if the mother doesn’t want the child. The point of conception has passed.
The father deciding he doesn’t want the children is too late. His option to withdraw ended five years ago when the embryos were created.

Friday, 3 March 2006

Channel Island Tax Loophole Closed

With the loophole being closed on films operating in the UK, but using Jersey based distributors, does the government really believe that online stores will simply start charging their customers VAT thereby destroying the only advantage they have? Who wants to pay the same price for a DVD online and then have to wait 2-5 days to get it when you can go to the nearest high street store and buy it there?

Or, as I believe, will these companies move so they are physically located in Jersey (like Play.com), thereby destroying UK based jobs?

This is useless legislation. It will change nothing.

For more details: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/jersey/4759422.stm

Entry for March 03, 2006

On Wednesday my company, which shall be identified only by its initials SL, took action against a highly controversial and lewd website.

They banned www.dictionary.com

I, of course, immediately sent an email to the IT deppartment askng why they didnt’ want us to no how 2 spel things.

I’m still waiting for a reply.

Saturday, 18 February 2006

Happy Endings

Happy Endings.

Why is it modern movies all seem to require a happy ending? Is it a script requirement?

Take ‘Hitch’ starring Will Smith. Is it me, or did the ending not gel with the script? It didn’t feel tacked on as an afterthought, like other movies, but there just was something that didn’t feel right.

Sara publishes her story on Hitch, quite effectively destroying his business. She openly (in the speed dating scene) admits that ruining Albert Brenamen’s relationship with Allegra is the price to break the story, and numberous other relationships are shown in the film to hit rocky patches or break up. The thing is, she knows what she’s doing but she doesn’t care. Even though she’s under the misaprehension that Hitch just helps men get women into bed.

The ending didn’t work with me. There’s a scene (’No comment’), where Hitch (in the only such part of the film) is mean and hurtful to Sara. This scene seems to exists solely for the purpose of setting up the ending, where Hitch makes the big showy gesture at the end of the film, just like every other romantic movie.

In the prior scene where Hitch is mean to Sara and tells her ‘no comment’, she starts off saying she didn’t mean to hurt him. In truth, the line I was expecting was ‘No, you just didn’t care if you did’, which is true. She didn’t.

I just felt it should have been Sara that had to make the big romantic gesture. She’s the one in the wrong, she ruined his life and she’s the one who needs to make the gesture.

For another example look at ‘How To lose A Guy In 10 Days’ with Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey. Kate sets out to write a column entry about losing a guy. Matthew has to win a girl for a bet, thus winning a contract.

It’s this kind of stupid equallity in movies I don’t understand. It’s like the movie studios are saying “You can’t have one person in a romantic comedy being the nasty one. They both have to have flaws, or be nasty.” Having Kate being the one writing the column, but Matthew just being a nice guy and having a sad, ‘doesn’t get the guy’ ending would have been better.

It’s the sad endings we’ve not seen for a while. Sad endings can be great. I don’t want a happy ending in every movie I see.

People don’t go to the movies to feel happy. They go to the movies to feel. If I want to feel happy, I’ll grab a coke and pig out on chocolate and let the endorphins do their work. That’s why ‘Lost In translation’ is such a great film. You can feel the claustrophobia and desperation and boredom of the two main characters.

When was the last “Gone With The Wind” ending?

This is why I liked ‘Sliding Doors’, because although there is a kind of a happy ending in the lift, there’s also a sad ending becuase one ‘version’ of Gwyneth Paltrow dies. It was a nice break from the norm of “Happily Ever After.”

Sunday, 5 February 2006

Red Sea Ferry Sinking

Once I read more about the ferry that sank en route to Egypt from Saudi Arabia, I couldn’t help having a thought.

Why do we continue to sell these ferries overseas. A lot of ferries and liners used in the area are ones that were sold off by a UK company because the ship no longer met UK safety requirements.

If the ship isn’t safe to sail here, why should it be OK for it to sail anywhere?

If it’s dangerous, it should be decommissioned, or converted into a cargo ship, not continue to transport large numbers of passengers.